NORTH CAROLINA RESIDENT LIVE BIRTH RATES PER 1,000 POPULATION, 2000-2002

  TOTAL BIRTHS TOTAL RATE WHITE BIRTHS WHITE RATE MINORITY BIRTHS MINORITY RATE
RESIDENCE 355,666 14.5 256,662 14.0 99,004 15.8
NORTH CAROLINA
ALAMANCE 5,615 14.0 4,436 14.0 1,179 13.9
ALEXANDER 1,283 12.6 1,192 12.5 91 13.9
ALLEGHANY 330 10.2 326 10.3 4 5.7
ANSON 997 13.1 434 11.5 563 14.7
ASHE 751 10.2 743 10.2 8 6.7
AVERY 525 9.9 519 10.3 6 2.4
BEAUFORT 1,921 14.1 1,254 13.1 667 16.4
BERTIE 785 13.2 214 9.9 571 15.1
BLADEN 1,402 14.4 838 14.5 564 14.2
BRUNSWICK 2,572 11.2 2,138 11.1 434 11.9
BUNCOMBE 7,651 12.2 6,820 12.0 831 14.0
BURKE 3,273 12.2 2,833 12.0 440 13.6
CABARRUS 6,523 16.0 5,496 15.7 1,027 17.6
CALDWELL 2,958 12.7 2,757 12.6 201 12.8
CAMDEN 221 10.4 176 10.1 45 11.6
CARTERET 1,790 10.0 1,601 9.8 189 12.0
CASWELL 774 10.9 547 12.3 227 8.6
CATAWBA 6,269 14.4 5,331 14.1 938 17.0
CHATHAM 2,009 13.1 1,732 13.9 277 9.7
CHEROKEE 803 10.8 771 10.9 32 10.0
CHOWAN 576 13.4 286 10.8 290 17.5
CLAY 237 8.8 233 8.8 4 9.2
CLEVELAND 3,832 13.2 2,779 12.3 1,053 16.1
COLUMBUS 2,384 14.5 1,481 13.9 903 15.6
CRAVEN 4,746 17.2 3,424 17.3 1,322 17.0
CUMBERLAND 16,413 18.0 9,681 18.3 6,732 17.6
CURRITUCK 658 11.6 619 11.9 39 8.1
DARE 1,058 11.3 1,010 11.3 48 12.8
DAVIDSON 5,803 13.0 5,165 13.0 638 12.8
DAVIE 1,365 12.6 1,286 12.9 79 9.3
DUPLIN 2,421 16.2 1,806 17.2 615 13.7
DURHAM 11,501 16.7 6,245 16.6 5,256 16.9
EDGECOMBE 2,411 14.6 927 13.5 1,484 15.3
FORSYTH 13,752 14.7 9,951 14.9 3,801 14.3
FRANKLIN 1,988 13.5 1,427 14.1 561 12.3
GASTON 7,882 13.7 6,531 13.5 1,351 14.7
GATES 335 10.5 189 9.9 146 11.4
GRAHAM 294 12.2 264 11.9 30 15.9
GRANVILLE 1,784 11.9 1,255 13.1 529 9.7
GREENE 735 12.8 417 12.6 318 13.0
GUILFORD 17,844 14.0 10,785 12.8 7,059 16.2
HALIFAX 2,315 13.5 816 11.1 1,499 15.2
HARNETT 4,360 15.5 3,265 15.6 1,095 15.3
HAYWOOD 1,678 10.2 1,645 10.3 33 8.0
HENDERSON 3,220 11.7 3,052 11.7 168 13.0
HERTFORD 833 12.0 241 9.1 592 13.7
HOKE 2,007 19.1 1,141 22.4 866 16.0
HYDE 179 10.2 136 12.2 43 6.8
IREDELL 5,534 14.5 4,546 14.2 988 16.3
JACKSON 1,093 10.8 884 10.1 209 15.4
JOHNSTON 6,262 16.3 5,160 16.2 1,102 16.8
JONES 278 9.0 186 9.5 92 8.0
LEE 2,480 16.7 1,903 16.5 577 17.4
LENOIR 2,491 14.0 1,296 12.5 1,195 16.0
LINCOLN 2,624 13.4 2,456 13.5 168 11.3
MCDOWELL 1,585 12.4 1,514 12.6 71 9.1
MACON 922 10.1 904 10.1 18 8.6
MADISON 655 11.0 650 11.1 5 5.0
MARTIN 957 12.6 450 11.1 507 14.3
MECKLENBURG 36,429 16.9 23,927 16.6 12,502 17.6
MITCHELL 497 10.5 495 10.5 2 3.4
MONTGOMERY 1,215 14.9 946 15.4 269 13.4
MOORE 2,720 11.9 2,089 11.0 631 16.0
NASH 3,751 14.1 2,249 13.3 1,502 15.6
NEW HANOVER 6,095 12.4 4,593 11.5 1,502 16.2
NORTHAMPTON 727 11.0 261 10.0 466 11.7
ONSLOW 9,563 21.2 7,385 21.6 2,178 20.0
ORANGE 3,914 11.0 3,012 10.5 902 12.9
PAMLICO 306 7.9 217 7.5 89 8.8
PASQUOTANK 1,381 13.1 737 12.2 644 14.2
PENDER 1,476 11.7 1,150 12.1 326 10.5
PERQUIMANS 356 10.3 231 9.4 125 12.7
PERSON 1,391 12.8 942 12.3 449 14.0
PITT 6,004 14.7 3,383 13.0 2,621 17.8
POLK 531 9.5 502 9.6 29 7.7
RANDOLPH 5,569 14.0 5,172 14.1 397 13.3
RICHMOND 1,965 14.0 1,238 13.4 727 15.2
ROBESON 6,295 16.9 2,093 16.0 4,202 17.3
ROCKINGHAM 3,501 12.7 2,805 12.8 696 12.1
ROWAN 5,065 12.8 4,088 12.6 977 13.9
RUTHERFORD 2,451 12.9 2,108 12.7 343 14.5
SAMPSON 2,752 15.0 1,886 15.4 866 14.2
SCOTLAND 1,486 13.8 657 11.8 829 16.0
STANLY 2,260 12.8 1,879 12.5 381 15.1
STOKES 1,509 11.1 1,448 11.3 61 8.2
SURRY 2,847 13.2 2,668 13.2 179 14.5
SWAIN 528 13.4 307 11.6 221 17.1
TRANSYLVANIA 832 9.4 782 9.4 50 9.9
TYRRELL 132 10.6 77 10.6 55 10.6
UNION 6,856 17.3 5,854 17.2 1,002 18.1
VANCE 2,183 16.6 1,024 15.6 1,159 17.6
WAKE 31,848 16.1 23,292 15.7 8,556 17.4
WARREN 586 9.7 189 7.9 397 11.0
WASHINGTON 526 12.9 202 9.9 324 15.7
WATAUGA 1,039 8.1 1,006 8.1 33 8.6
WAYNE 5,161 15.1 3,271 14.9 1,890 15.5
WILKES 2,668 13.4 2,525 13.4 143 14.0
WILSON 3,266 14.6 1,829 13.9 1,437 15.6
YADKIN 1,463 13.3 1,408 13.4 55 11.6
YANCEY 578 10.7 571 10.8 7 9.6

PREPARED BY NC-DHHS STATE CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS (www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/)
RATES BASED ON SMALL NUMBERS (FEWER THAN 20 CASES)
ARE UNSTABLE AND SHOULD BE INTERPRETED WITH CAUTION